tvordlj: (Daffy Weird)
tvordlj ([personal profile] tvordlj) wrote2007-04-11 05:35 pm

(no subject)

I've been comparing user reviews and getting more and more confused, re digital cameras. Each one i like that i look up reviews for, has good and bad and my own opinion of the cameras have plusses and minuses too. One is a Panasonic 5 mp with a 10x zoom which i really do like. The drawbacks are that there is no optical viewfinder and it's a lithium ion battery pack. The other one is a Canon A710 IS. It's 7 MP, a 6x zoom and it uses regular AA batteries (rechargeables) which i like. But on the minus side, it has a lot more features than i need, and no on screen battery monitor, also has no "last photo review" unless you change the mode to replay and i do like that feature. The user reviews on dpreview.com have an equal amount of "i love this camera" and "the low light photos have too much noise". I looked at the user manual for both and the one for the Canon seems a lot more complicated than it needs to be. I"m leaning to the Panasonic for the Zoom especially. The battery pack does put me off a bit and a spare one ain't cheap. The Panasonic is on a clearance price for $299.99 at The Source (though i'm reluctant to buy from them) or $329.99 from Future Shop though they'll meet the other price. The Canon is a bit more expensive but .... it's a Canon. Both have Image stabilizer.

Confused.
ext_1598774: (Default)

[identity profile] acey.livejournal.com 2007-04-11 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure what sort of battery pack that one has, but I usually get 50 - 100 shots off one of my batteries (depending on how much I'm using the flash). Also, I have some non-Panasonic batteries which are less expensive.

[identity profile] tvor.livejournal.com 2007-04-12 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
It's a lithium-ion pack, not AA rechargeables which my current one has and which the Canon has. It's a plus that you can buy regular alkaline batteries in a pinch and they don't have to be panasonic brand like the battery pack does.