(no subject)
Oct. 7th, 2004 08:03 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My mobile just rang. Wrong number. Had one yesterday too. I've had more wrong numbers on that thing in the 2 and a half months i've had it then i think i get at home in a year. Well that doesn't count all those times the phone rings and there's nothing there, not a person, just dead air. I think that happens from a computer call or a call center i'm told. Usually the answering machine gets them in the daytime. Or people just realize it's the wrong number when they hear the answering machine message and just hang up. If you know me and y ou get the answering machine, DON'T hang up! Just say your name even if you hate machines lol Now that i don't have call display on my mobile, i don't even see the number or the name if it's in my phone book. That's annoying. I may get that put back on even if it's a paid service. At least i can see the numbers then. (Update, have gone online and added call display and it works! Yay!)
Then there's people that leave their mobile phones on their desk and go off somewhere. And it rings. and rings. Over and over. Because it's her kids trying to ask her something that they absolutely can't wait for. even though it's never an emergency. And they keep trying every 2-3 minutes or less.
Then there's people that leave their mobile phones on their desk and go off somewhere. And it rings. and rings. Over and over. Because it's her kids trying to ask her something that they absolutely can't wait for. even though it's never an emergency. And they keep trying every 2-3 minutes or less.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 04:47 am (UTC)Is cellphone just a USAnian aberration, then?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 07:08 am (UTC)I'm still quite amused by the whole "pants" thing personally - I can quite easily imagine a situation where somebody not in the know in the wrong country could end up rather embarrassed!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 07:21 am (UTC)There was a young lady from Tottenham,
Who had no manners, or else she'd forgotten 'em.
At tea at the vicar's,
She tore off her knickers,
Because, she explained, she felt 'ot in 'em.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 07:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 08:45 am (UTC)"Shorts" are short trousers - overwear. Worn in summer or for sports (over a jockstrap).
"Pants" are aka "underpants" - so they're underwear. "Pants" is also used as a derogatory adjective. 'Did you see the remake of Rear Window? Pants, wasn't it?'
"Briefs" are underpants. I think I've heard "undershorts" and a Kiwi girl I once met used "Jockeys" to describe any male underwear. A man would only use the expression "knickers" to describe his own nether underwear as a joke, or because he was actually wearing his girlfriend's/wife's/partner's knickers.
What does blow my mind is when Carson on Queer Eye holds up a pair of trousers and calls them a "pant". He might pant for them, but I don't!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 09:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 09:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 10:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 08:33 am (UTC)Knickers is a good word - it's also good as a swearword around elderly aunts!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 04:51 am (UTC)Any hints/suggestions on who to go with/not go with ?
I had call display put on my house phone for a total of 5 days. Drove me crazy. whereas before, i would answer the phone when it rang (or not, if I couldn't get to it, didn't want to get to it), but when I had call display, I would run to the phone, check the number (??) and then answer. Like, what difference does it make? Drove me crazy !
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 04:58 am (UTC)Who to avoid? i think Telus are not quite as good as Rogers and Aliant. Not quite as good coverage. Rogers and Aliant both say they have the best coverage. There are dead zones with both. Coverages across Canada, Aliant is linked to Bell mobility and Rogers is national as well as with ATT so i guess just see what plans are available and decide from there. I went with the most basic plan they had.
I also have Primus for long distance and that hooks up to my mobile as well. I just dial a local number first and then the number. Dead cheap.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 11:38 am (UTC)